Gemini vs GPT: Which is Better and Why?

It’s undeniable that GPT is really the most popular AI because of ChatGPT, which is a chatbot and virtual assistant based on large language models (LLMs), and DALL-E, which is one of the best text-to-image models to date. However, Google, the internet giant, has backed Gemini, one of the most advanced AI tools with many promising features, and it is currently competing with ChatGPT in the field of large language models.

Both models have the ability to generate content writing, craft creative content, brainstorm ideas and answer your questions in an informative manner. But what are the strengths of the two that overlap in their capabilities? It’s time to find out which LLMs based AI is the best and why you should use them.

The Multimodality King (GPT)

When it comes to multimodality, let’s not forget that GPT has completely taken over Gemini with the launch of GPT-4o. With the GPT-4o, you can now give prompts or input from not just text but also audio, image, and video. You are able to generate any combination of text, audio, and image outputs.

And let’s not forget about the GPT-4 model which can generate not only text but also images. Imagine you need to create a blog post with infographics or make a social media post with a design. You can now do all that with the GPT-4 model with the ChatGPT. Just type the prompt and it will give you what you need.

While Gemini does offer image generation and accepts input not only from text but also in images and files, it’s not a fully complete experience like GPT-4. And Gemini image generation is not as perfect as DALL-E yet. Even for Google, Gemini is still too young and needs more developments for multimodality like GPT. So, in this battle, GPT comes on top as the winner.

Real-Time Web Access (Gemini)

Ask any questions about current events in the world, and Gemini can give you direct answers faster than GPT. This is because GPT relies on a massive pre-trained dataset, whereas Gemini has always had the unique ability to have direct access to the web. Also, backed by the internet giant search engine Google, Gemini’s ability to give information and recent events about the latest information will always be faster than GPT.

However, this does not mean GPT doesn’t have access to the web at all. With the latest iterations, GPT can now search for the latest information on the web and give you answers. We’re talking speed and constant connection to the web. Gemini was trained with real-time web access, while GPT AI’s intelligence is based on a pre-trained dataset, which is quite different. So Gemini is clearly the winner.

Long-Form Content Creation Expert (GPT)

With no real-time access to the web and only relying on pre-trained dataset, you might think GPT is at a disadvantage here, right? No. For long-form content creation, GPT takes the lead against Gemini. Its ability to generate detailed articles, scripts, marketing copy, and even fictional narratives makes it a favorite tool for content creators.

This strength comes from the GPT’s training of vast amounts of text data, readily available to craft anything that your mind desires and allowing you to adjust styles and tones to give you personalized content that you want within seconds. From simple questions like cooking recipes to complex step-by-step tutorials, GPT has it all and will answer you with complete detail.

You may also like : 5 Effective AI Tools for Digital Marketers

Factual Accuracy Professional (Gemini)

While GPT uses a pre-trained dataset and will generate factually correct answers, training-data limitations are the major problem. Some of the training-data limitations include outdated information, biased opinions, or lack information on specifics topics. And sometimes, GPT can generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect information.

Gemini is extensively good at this area because of deep access to Google’s Knowledge Graph. And also, there can be no outdated information because of what we mentioned earlier about real-time web access. The combination of real-time web access along with Google’s Knowledge Graph makes Gemini a factually accurate AI which users can rely on for up-to-date information. Gemini takes this round.

Integration and Accessibility (GPT)

When it comes to integration and accessibility, GPT has a clear advantage over Gemini. GPT is more widely integrated with other tools and platforms, making it easier for users to access and use. For example, GPT is integrated with Google Workspace, Microsoft Office, and Slack, allowing users to access GPT’s capabilities directly within these platforms.

GPT is now available on both Apple with the official ChatGPT app and Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC which uses GPT-4o. Additionally, GPT has a number of public APIs that allow developers to integrate GPT into their own applications and services. This makes GPT a more versatile and accessible tool for users of all types.

Integration and Accessibility (Gemini)

Gemini, on the other hand, is still in its early stages of development and does not have the same level of integration and accessibility as GPT. While Gemini does have some integrations with Google products, such as Gmail and Google Docs, it is not as widely integrated as GPT. Additionally, Gemini does not have any public APIs, which limits its accessibility for developers.

However, it is important to note that Gemini is still under development and Google is likely to improve its integration and accessibility over time. As Gemini continues to develop, it is likely to become more widely integrated and accessible, making it a more competitive alternative to GPT.

Conclusion

Both GPT and Gemini are powerful AI tools with a wide range of capabilities. However, there are some key differences between the two tools that users should consider when choosing which one to use. GPT is more widely integrated and accessible, while Gemini has better factual accuracy and real-time web access.

If we have to decide which is better, while Gemini has potential to develop far better than GPT, we have to give the crown to GPT for better user experience and versatility for now. However, the best tool for you will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!